Tuesday, May 31, 2011

pictures of natalie portman and

pictures of natalie portman and. Natalie Portman Graphic For
  • Natalie Portman Graphic For


  • robbieduncan
    Apr 26, 10:53 AM
    Y
    P.S. The box surrounding the up/down buttons is baboon-ass ugly.

    What box? Not seeing one here (Firefox 4 on Windows Vista at work)




    pictures of natalie portman and. Natalie Portman#39;s
  • Natalie Portman#39;s


  • JAT
    Apr 5, 04:26 PM
    "celebrate advertising"???

    Should we be passing out poison, then?




    pictures of natalie portman and. Natalie Portman
  • Natalie Portman


  • drsmithy
    Oct 5, 02:33 AM
    It'd be pretty easy to check actually, and really quite legal. The part of Mac OS X that actually implements SMP is the kernel, which is part of Darwin. You can install Darwin without fear of repurcusions, on your toaster, if you want.

    Isn't the version of Darwin underpinning OS X/Intel no longer Open Source ?




    pictures of natalie portman and. Natalie Portman
  • Natalie Portman


  • MattSepeta
    Apr 27, 04:19 PM
    am I the only one to think that separate restroom from men and women are an obsolete relic of the past?
    put stalls in. that should be enough for privacy. full separate facility don't make any sense logically, technically and economically.

    Interesting take, but I can see in 1080p the impending sexual harassment lawsuits.



    more...

    pictures of natalie portman and. pictures of natalie portman
  • pictures of natalie portman


  • KnightWRX
    Mar 13, 12:32 PM
    For me, I do see the iPad (and actually the App Store) as a change in computing. By removing the complex processes that we go through in a computer (eg instead of downloading an app, moving it into a folder, deleting the dmg its a simple case of downloading the app), the iPad is changing our computer experience by simplifying it to the extent that it's only the part we want to use rather than need to use.

    But that is not redefining "Computing" or computers at all. It's simply making them easier to use. If you want it to absolutely be about redefining something, talk about usability, not computing.

    The iPad is still receiving network/USB input for that app, processing the data and eventually storing it. It is still doing the very same concept of computing we were doing 50 years ago on massive mainframes. There is no shift in "computing".

    You again failed to address this point in your quest to see redefinition where there is none. You're thinking at way to precise of a level to even talk about computers/computing.

    The iPad and the App Store process have the potential to kickstart and similarly drastic change in computing as moving from a line based OS to a GUI.

    Again, no change in "Computing" there. You're talking about usability once again. Line based or GUI based, it was all about taking input, processing it, storing the resulting data or outputting it. Be it with printf() statements or XCreateWindow() and then drawing to it.

    The concept of computing is the same in both line based or GUI based interface. The output mechanism is different, the input device is different.

    In this case, "input is not input": a GUI opened up computers to more than just programmers

    You have not proven your hypothesis of "input is not input". It very much is. Clicking and typing are both types of input. I challenge you to prove otherwise.

    but increasingly I think the computer is moving away from the idea of a desktop PC.

    The computer has never been so intimate with Desktop PCs. Every desktop PC is a computer, not every computer is a desktop PC. Again, last 50 years of computing has seen tremendous boost in computer usage in about everything. The desktop PC has been one small segment of computer usage and of the very large computing industry. Embedded systems is another. Mainframe systems are still very much alive. Thin client computing is an idea of the 70s that saw a come back in the 90s with Sun's push ("The network is the computer"). Today, it's all about "mobile" devices, which are a type of embedded system.

    I think you're just very ignorant (not meant as an insult, just a casual observation based on your replies) of what computing and computers actually are that you see a "new segment" as a massive paradigm shift. There is no shift. Again :

    Input. Process. Output. Store.

    There is no more to it than that and until you change this very simple definition, you have not shifted any paradigms in computing.




    pictures of natalie portman and. Natalie Portman: Bad Hair
  • Natalie Portman: Bad Hair


  • bikertwin
    Sep 25, 03:47 PM
    Yes, a very good point. And it makes me wonder if Adobe will ever charge for it. In fact, now they have rebranded it Adobe "Photoshop" Darkroom, it leads me to believe it will be included as part of Photoshop and not as a seperate product. This might also be why they haven't released it yet, since the next version of Photoshop isn't finished. This strategy would undercut Apple since most photography professionals undoubtedly already own Photoshop and will upgrade.

    No, Adobe is claiming Lightroom will be released in late early a good 3 months before PS CS3.

    I think with this rebranding, they're positioning Lightroom between PS Elements and PS CS, hence PS Lightroom.



    more...

    pictures of natalie portman and. natalie portman shaved head
  • natalie portman shaved head


  • superleccy
    Aug 7, 03:06 PM
    UK prices have not changed still �529 for the 20" and �779 for 23", i'm ready to buy a new Mac Pro 2.66 & a Cinema Display but not if the UK prices dont drop.

    Grrrrrrrrrrrr. Come on Apple. And God bless the BBC.




    pictures of natalie portman and. Natalie Portman
  • Natalie Portman


  • fikonhjul
    May 4, 07:12 PM
    Looks like Roambi??
    Second guess is MicroStrategy
    Could very well be, but I haven't seen that particular coolness demoed anywhere. Maybe an upcoming version of one of those, or some other business data visualizer?



    more...

    pictures of natalie portman and. natalie portman hairstyles
  • natalie portman hairstyles


  • PeteyKohut
    Jan 15, 04:05 PM
    This has to be one of the worst Macworld keynotes ever....and there were a couple of stinkers. I mean....where are the new MacBook Pros? Where is a new Mini? Where is an AppleTV with an OPTICAL DRIVE! Nowhere to be seen. What do we get? A new laptop where they charge us more and give us less. I mean...when was the last time Apple shipped a computer without Firewire??? Please! Hell...they should have saved the Mac Pro announcement for today, to add SOMETHING to the awful show. Maybe then my portfolio wouldn't have taken the dive it did. Come on, Steve, is this the best you can do? Where are these new Apple/Intel devices??? My biggest disappointment is the lack of Blu-Ray though. I mean, no new iPod? No new iPhone. I mean....I don't need anything HUGE, just some storage increases. Bad....bad bad bad.




    pictures of natalie portman and. Natalie-Portman-7
  • Natalie-Portman-7


  • Arran
    Mar 17, 07:03 AM
    OP: Just curious. Roughly what bill denominations did you hand over? Was it mostly big bills? Or a mess of ones, fives, tens, twenties and coins?

    Did you count it along with him? There's no chance a relative secretly slipped an extra $300 in your iPad fund - just to be nice to you. It's been known to happen.



    more...

    pictures of natalie portman and. Travel / Natalie Portman
  • Travel / Natalie Portman


  • John Purple
    Jan 10, 07:18 AM
    iPhone will be release in Australia within the next month (end of Feb by the latest) only on the Telstra network. Unfortunately Telstra has exclusive rights for the iPhone, so the product will be awesome (e.g. being Apple) but the service provider will be crap....

    At my work we got a demo of the iPhone from Telstra for development reasons, we will be supplying data for a few of the services for the iPhone in Australia.

    Obviously Apple loves bad providers. In Germany they contracted T-Mobile, a Telekom AG company (not because of bad service ... but because of no service at all :eek: - as experienced in the past) That's THE reason why I don't want an iPhone.




    pictures of natalie portman and. Natalie Portman Images
  • Natalie Portman Images


  • tarasis
    Apr 5, 03:47 PM
    Not yet in the German app store, curious if it will appear there.



    more...

    pictures of natalie portman and. ecstasy_lover: Natalie Portman
  • ecstasy_lover: Natalie Portman


  • Benjy91
    Apr 18, 06:43 AM
    Ahhhh.... dude... the only Apps that don't really get approved are ones that do things that can cause security risks or just plain trying to steal your information.

    Not true, Id say that is in the small minority, believing that is falling in line with the people who believe that simply plugging a PC running Windows into the Internet will result in it being flooded with viruses within seconds.

    There are plenty of apps on my iPhone from Cydia that merely add improved functionality, like 'Infinifolder' which lets me have unlimited apps in a folder. iBlacklist, which lets me block numbers without having to get my carrier to do it for me. BiteSMS, which lets me read, reply, look up their profile, or call them from the recieved SMS window, without having to leave my current App.




    pictures of natalie portman and. Natalie Portman is Single
  • Natalie Portman is Single


  • fivepoint
    May 5, 01:44 PM
    I agree.

    Well, in this case, many hospitals require you to have a car seat on hand before you drive your newborn home. So, there is some input from doctors based on a public health perspective. And, frankly, it's a good thing.

    Yes, I noted the variability of the argument in an earlier post. You distilled it down nicely. There are overtones though regarding the role of government in controlling what doctors can and can't do that I find distasteful in both situations while, as you pointed out, others seem ok with in some.



    "There is nothing wrong with a doctor talking to anyone about guns, as they can be a risk to health."

    True, if at the bar in the country club among friends, or at a session of shooting skeet. I've taught a couple of doctors about guns, and freely admit to knowing them. Doctors can be okay people, although some are socially unacceptable IMO.

    But otherwise it's exactly like asking someone how much money they have in the bank. You don't ask a farmer how many acres he owns--which is the same thing. Nor ask a rancher how many head of cattle he runs. Rude, discourteous and just plain ignorant.

    Rude, discourteous and just plain ignorant is assaying pretty high-grade in today's society--but it's still stupidity at its finest.

    A doctor has no way of knowing the circumstances of somebody's homelife--and since there are tens of millions of homes I submit that there is no "One size fits all" to allow some outsider's judgement. He is no expert on firearms use or safety, absent being a "gunny" himself.

    It's nobody's business how much of what that I own or how much money I have. Ah, well, nothing's really new among idiots. Hank Williams sang about it over sixty years ago: "If you mind your own business, then you won't be minding mine; if you mind your own business you'll stay busy all the time."

    Didn't know things were so different down in Texas, but here in Iowa it's not rude to ask a farmer how many acres they have nor how many cattle they run. My family farm has both, and we get those questions all the time. Not a big deal. That being said, if my doctor asked me if I had guns, and how many, in the course of a checkup, my response would be... "Why? Why in the world do you want to know that?" If he said so that he could calculate risk and provide suggestions in that regard, I'd tell him to kindly mind his own business and I'd tend to the safety of my own family. If he was a jerk about it, I'd get a new doctor... plain and simple. The government shouldn't be involved at all in telling him what he can and can't ask... it's a free country. Likewise, if that same doctor asked me what my religion was, I answered Lutheran, to which he replied that he could no longer provide me services as he only did business with straight atheists, I would be totally ok with that as well. His choice. If it was life and death, and he let me die when no other alternatives were available, then it'd be a prosecutable offense having nothing to do with religion.



    more...

    pictures of natalie portman and. Natalie Portman, Devendra
  • Natalie Portman, Devendra


  • cuestakid
    Apr 11, 09:53 PM
    Sharks playoff tickets against the Kings 4/16
    http://sharkspage.com/jpgs4/sharks_territory.jpg
    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5185/5611814286_62d5df7613.jpg

    Lucky you-when u sitting ?(I live in SF and have been to many playoff games)

    and be sure to go here and gloat with me!

    http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1009685




    pictures of natalie portman and. Natalie-Portman-6
  • Natalie-Portman-6


  • iMikeT
    Oct 17, 07:24 PM
    What ever the outcome is in the end, the hardware of one of these formats will be nothing more than a paper weight.



    more...

    pictures of natalie portman and. Natalie Portman playing
  • Natalie Portman playing


  • balamw
    Oct 5, 08:23 AM
    Your average ipod owner could not possibly give a flying %^@$ about how Fairplay's DRM compares to other mp3 players' DRM. Talking about "DRM transparent" like its something that Joe Consumer has any clue about is delusional at best.
    That's the point, if they don't "see" the DRM, hence the transparency, it doesn't bother them one bit. I haven't seen the need for things like hymn since the DRM doesn't stop me from doing anything I want to do with the files, such as burn a CD or move it to another machine.

    I'm pretty sure that that's not how FairPlay works. I think it goes something like this...
    Definitely not per file, Wikipedia has a pretty good summary of how it actually works here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FairPlay#How_it_works . More that a database of all files the device can play is downloaded from the store...

    B




    pictures of natalie portman and. Stop Wars Natalie Portman |
  • Stop Wars Natalie Portman |


  • roadbloc
    Mar 29, 11:36 AM
    2. There won't be a Microsoft AppStore for Windows INTEGRATED INTO WINDOWS. EVER. Why? Because they can't for LEGAL reasons...
    Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't the Windows Live Marketplace in Windows Vista a integrated (badly integrated but still integrated), App Store before it was discontinued due to lack of consumers and made to redirect to a Microsoft website that sold some products?




    pictures of natalie portman and. pictures of natalie portman
  • pictures of natalie portman


  • frjonah
    Apr 29, 10:12 PM
    This may be off-topic, but does anyone know if the recently purchased Mac products are "grandfathered in" for a Lion release? In other words, I just bought a new MacBook Pro yesterday... am I going to need to pay to upgrade to Lion?

    It would, of course, be nice if the upgrade was free for recent purchasers similar to what MS did with the release of Win 7, but I'm assuming that since I can't find anything out about it, there's probably nothing to be hopeful about.




    LondonCentral
    Apr 9, 12:50 AM
    The only "Worst Buy" I am against is the one in Owings Mills, MD where they discriminated against me just because of a small disability. Pending a court case with corporate on this matter.. and I used to work for them back in 2005 and left them on a great note. Eligible for re-hire.. then tried to go back to them(Owings Mills) and the manager was very disrespectful and also discriminatory.

    I plan to have that store shut down permanently.

    What kinda bizarre court case would result in an entire store being shut down!?
    Unless there's toxic material under the damn thing the most you'll get is an apology and perhaps a little compensation. If you succeed of course. Good luck though.




    Ugg
    Apr 15, 07:06 PM
    What is Gay History? History, while interesting, has always struck me as unimportant in educating Children for essential workforce skills. Leave history for Colleges or elective courses.

    Wow! I don't think I've ever seen a more freaky Orwellian comment on this forum. Is the only point of education to create little drones for the military-industrial complex?

    People who have made history have just been people and gay or straight have never come into it. What does it matter? A stand alone class in college on "gay studies" I would have no problem with. The requirement in public schools to teach gay history is bit absurd.

    Those who are gay and feel as if they've been wronged, I feel for them and effort to make it right, but the level of suffering by gay is nothing compared to what black people or women have endured over the centuries. It bothers me a little when gay suffrage is pitted against something like slavery. Just not the same, IMO.

    Unless I'm mistaken, gay people can be black, they can also be women, they can also have been slaves. I'm sure there were plenty of gay Chinese who suffered under the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Exclusion_Act) Gosh! There might even have been gay slave owners! Or even gay industrialists!

    Why is it so wrong to bring the subject up? The entire point of the law is to include it in the relevant subject matter, not to make it an independent class.

    You've always been reasonably level headed about such issues, so I can only assume that you were in a hurry and didn't read the article. Please correct me if I'm wrong...




    Mal
    Jul 25, 12:03 AM
    I'd be worried about that exept one incontrovertible fact. Steve Jobs has more creative spark in his left pinky than M$ does in it whole genetic tree.

    I think that's the idea. The implication I got was that they were going to give Microsoft a generous stretch of rope and let them hang themselves.

    jW




    Mikeadelic
    Apr 6, 06:54 AM
    There's another, much more messed up story (http://www.slashgear.com/apple-rejects-iphone-app-for-lack-of-functionality-later-releases-app-with-same-functionality-itself-06144635/) behind this app. For those too lazy to click on the link, basically Apple decided to reject a third-party app that has the same functionality as the iAd Gallery for -- get this -- "lack of functionality". Then it turns around and develops the exact same app.

    If what Apple has done here doesn't demonstrate anti-competitiveness, then I don't know what does.




    GQB
    Apr 16, 12:05 AM
    Yes and Palm smartphones and Blackberries never existed before the iPhone.

    Name anything that did not build upon previous knowledge.
    The 'Apple hasn't invented anything' meme is such nonsense.
    Making things usable and desired is probably the biggest invention possible.

    And by that what do you mean. iPhones had little impact on phones like the BB Curve

    Yeah... And how's that Curve doing?



    No comments:

    Post a Comment